Patrick McHenry votes to protect foreign oil barons

When Patrick McHenry was asked why he donated his campaign over $170,000 (a donation which made his campaign funds larger than his opponents), he claimed that it was a “personal investment in his fight for good jobs and lower gas prices.”. So what’s McHenry been doing in Congress?

A few days ago, Patrick McHenry decided to vote against H.R. 6604, the Commodity Market Transparency and Accountability Act. This act, in essence, requires recordkeeping and holds foreign boards of trade to meet specific US requirements, such as access to electronic trading systems. As well, it directs the GAO to do an investigation into the “regime” that manages energy commodities- in layman’s terms, figure out why the hell gas prices are so high, and make sure the foreign oil barons aren’t tricking us. The worry is that people overseas are manipulating gas prices, which is why it’s so expensive to fill up nowadays.

Of course, anyone can see that it’s a reasonable bill- and 61 Republicans supported the bill, leading a huge majority of 276 to 151. Unfortunately, it wasn’t passed- you need two thirds vote- and guess who didn’t vote for it?

That’s right, Patrick McHenry. Unwilling to work with “them dimmercrats”, McHenry decided that Western Carolina could suffer higher gas prices as he literally made sure the discussion died down.

Of course, McHenry got angry that the Democrats picked up on this, and then tried to create more discussion (because he wanted to start the discussion, presumably) and came out swinging complaining about how a 5-week vacation was declared.

Long story short? McHenry refused to actually vote for a solid energy exploration bill that would have conservatively examined the oil issues we have today, and instead opted to allow foreign oil barons to manipulate our gas prices (through the “Enron Loophole”) and enjoy their big profits as normal American families struggle to afford everything from groceries to transportation.

Oh yeah, and McHenry has recently gotten $58,000 from the oil industry toward his campaign.

Thanks, McHenry!

Patrick McHenry “loan” reveals long history of expensive meals, concert tickets

Republicans have long stood for hard line financial management- we’re often the proverbial bankers of the world, reigning in excessive spending and working to manage finances in a world where Americans dig themselves deeper into debt. Sometimes, though, some Republicans tend to treat money like water- and it shows.

Patrick McHenry was planning to champion his own fundraising ability until the Lenoir News-Topic picked up on a very interesting tidbit of information: Patrick McHenry has been loaning himself money to the tune of $175,000, in an addition to a $90,500 loan made from his first campaign. That’s right, folks: while gas prices are rising and the world struggles in intense debt, McHenry has been loaning his campaign more money than many make in 5 years.

But the big question is where the money’s been flowing. Rebecca Yount, one of McHenry’s “spokespeople” (McHenry never talks to the press himself), claims that the money is “personal investment in his fight for good jobs and lower gas prices.” Is that true?

According to Open Secrets’ Page on Patrick McHenry, McHenry’s money hasn’t been going to Western NC at all- in fact, most of it is spent on lavish meals and payoffs to other campaigns. I’m not kidding. To this author’s knowledge, the most Patrick McHenry has ever spent in Western NC has been at the prestigous Lake Hickory Country Club, for $503 (excluding payments made to employees/rent/glossy mailers/etc).


So where has McHenry been spending his big money? Here are some of the bigger numbers:

$45,838 - Paid to The Oorbeek Group, for “Fundraising” (evidently not going so well)
$62,471 - Paid to The Stewart Group, mainly for “Planning & Development”. Of what?
$33,288 - Paid to Wiley Rein, LLC, for legal retainers. If you’ll remember, this is after he was potentially linked to an NRCC money scandal- so that’s “cover your butt” money.
$16,000 - Paid to Revolution Media Group for “Planning & Development”. Of what?
$12,000 - Paid towards Response Consulting flyers- you know, those glossy mailers you throw away.
$33,871 - Paid to GR Seppala & Associates for “Fundraising” (not going so well either)
$16,287 - Paid to Integrated Communication Strategies, Inc for “Fundraising” (Again, not doing such a good job)
$70,500 - To the NRCC for “Contributions”. That’s right- the biggest lump of his cash isn’t even being used for his campaign.
$49,823 - Platinum Business Card (For “Service Charges”…? I’m glad I don’t have that card…)
$10,101 - The Capitol Hill Club in Washington, DC. Including one night worth $4,843. That’s a LOT of beer.
$2,132 - Congressional Institute “Retreat” (AKA Vacation)

Oh, but it gets dirtier.

- Remember “The Home of the Perfect Christmas Tree”, that came forward in late 2007 claiming McHenry was a wonderful candidate? He spent nearly $5,000 there in November.

- McHenry spent $702 at the 9:30 Club in Washington, DC. The 9:30 Club is a venue that “presents top-name rock, punk, hip-hop and country acts nightly.” Sounds political, doesn’t it?

- McHenry has spent $4,843 on a meal. That’s right- and because it’s not listed as an “event expense”, that means it was basically unrelated to the actual campaign. That’s one hell of a meal.


Of course, McHenry claims that he’s making a “personal investment”. In what, specifically, other than concert tickets and $4,843 meal charges?

McHenry staffers paid to delete McHenry scandals on Wikipedia

Patrick McHenry staffer Jason Deans has recently been caught editing the popular online encyclopedia Wikipedia to hide information about Patrick McHenry.

To summarize, Wikipedia is essentially an online encyclopedia that allows anyone to add or remove information so long as it is properly sourced somewhere online (for example, much like a college paper, you have to properly tell where you got your information). Information that is not cited (or obvious) is removed, and information that is properly cited is protected. Basically, the idea is so you can trust information on Wikipedia.

Of course, “Truth” and “Patrick McHenry” have no place together in the same sentence except for “Patrick McHenry tries to hide the truth”. Why?

As evident by the revision history of Wikipedia on the “Patrick McHenry” page, staffer Jason Deans (on McHenry’s payroll) has been trying to “spruce up” McHenry’s page- including removing information cited from popular magazines such as Roll Call, as well as adding unimportant information including a self-promoting blurb of the following:

McHenry credits his victory to his grassroots campaign which was developed by his political consultant Dee Stewart and executed by his campaign manager Jason Deans.

Accordingto the Wikipedia Revision History above, these edits were done by an account “Jason Deans”, as well as by mysterious accounts that continue to try to remove information about McHenry’s ties to Countrywide, his controversy regarding giving alcohol to minors, the real outcome of the Michael Aaron Lay charges, as well as other information regarding McHenry scandals.

Of course, Wikipedia owners and administrators have noticed this, including messaging one of the IPs Jason Deans used (65.40.234.49, which traces back to Raleigh, one of Deans’ hunting grounds), asking him “Can you justify un-doing that edit?”. Of course, he refused to answer.

This isn’t the first time McHenry’s tried hiding the truth from Wikipedia. Democrats initially picked up on how some Congressional IPs were being used to edit his info, as well as some IPs that looked suspiciously like Jason Deans, other McHenry staffers, or even Patrick McHenry himself. Some good examples from the site:

1. McHenry smooths over the Aaron Lay Article
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patrick_T._McHenry&diff=185722400&oldid=179391133
Someone on an IP from Reston, VA- that is, a stone’s throw away (or a nice morning drive-to-works away) from Washington DC. Note how it stresses the “former” aide part about Aaron Lay, and makes sure to includes McHenry’s argument in return- not something Wikipedia usually does, as they only care about facts. And they even nicely clean up his profile for him!

2. Voter Fraud? What Voter Fraud?
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patrick_T._McHenry&diff=180300739&oldid=179391133
Suddenly, out of nowhere(!), someone named RLB2002 starts magically deleting the Voter Fraud allegations section of McHenry’s Article! User RedShiftPA tries to restore it, but RLB2002 will not be satisfied.

3. I’m not gay!
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patrick_T._McHenry&diff=180694684&oldid=180365766
RLB2002 is back again to hide allegations that McHenry might just be a little light in the loafers.

4. No seriously, no voter fraud.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patrick_T._McHenry&diff=181610503&oldid=180694684
IP 96.231.121.248 comes on the scene to mysteriously delete the Voter Fraud section again. Where is this IP? Make a guess.
Washington DC.

5. And we hate that Drama Queen girl
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patrick_T._McHenry&diff=181664094&oldid=181617228
Suddenly, IP 65.194.118.11 (coming from Verizon Business, STRAIGHT OUT OF WASHINGTON DC) magically edits the article to remove both the voter fraud section… and the link to Drama Queen’s blog.

6. More Voter Fraud deletion!
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patrick_T._McHenry&diff=181859294&oldid=181768190
IP 65.194.118.11 (straight out of Washington, DC again) deletes the Voter Fraud section. Again.

7. We will deny you ever worked for us.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patrick_T._McHenry&diff=182147298&oldid=181883846
Aaron Lay section edited again. From Washington DC IP 96.231.121.248, naturally. And there’s more info about what McHenry said.

8. They never lived here!
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patrick_T._McHenry&diff=182387305&oldid=182181597
IP 75.199.91.223 out of New Jersey (?) decides to try to hide about McHenry’s housemates-with-benefits. Who vote for him. Illegally.

9. They didn’t live here!
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patrick_T._McHenry&diff=next&oldid=182432942
Again. Ip 65.194.118.11 out of DC, voter fraud, removes it, etc.

10. POORLY NEUTRAL POORLY SOURCED CONTENT
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patrick_T._McHenry&diff=next&oldid=182856047
IP 65.194.118.11 this time posts a comment on their removal of the information: “Removed non-neutral, poorly-sourced content”. Apparently, the truth hurts McHenry.

11. It’s not the size that matters, it’s the motion in the ocean.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patrick_T._McHenry&diff=next&oldid=184597070
IP 65.194.118.11 out of Washington DC would like you to know that McHenry is perfectly sized and can please any man he wants to.

Of course, we Republicans will be keeping an eye on McHenry’s little edits, and will be fixing them every time he tries to hide information. The Internet isn’t an advertising mechanism, Patrick- stop trying to make it one.

McHenry against McCain for President

On Feburary 12th, Patrick McHenry, a man who calls himself a staunch Republican, found himself the subject of the article in the Washington Post with the following introductory line:

At a private meeting of conservatives in the House of Representatives last month, Rep. Patrick T. McHenry (N.C.) ridiculed Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), asking why his fellow right-wing activists “shouldn’t be physically ill at the prospects of a President McCain.”

That’s right, folks- Patrick McHenry openly bashed a Republican, the man who is now the Republican candidate for the Presidency of the United States. Rather than retract his statement, issue an apology, or rather admit fault, he allowed Democrats to make light of the situation, tracking McHenry’s refusal to apologize, and generally embarrassing the Republican party.

McHenry did not openly sponsor any candidate, though he did support Ron Paul for a spell, though he never admitted it through his website or any speeches. All the comment did was serve to hurt the Republican party more, something McHenry continually does to embarass both himself and the party he “supports”.

For interested parties, the website for the candidacy of John McCain can be found here.

NCGOP: McHenry Xenophobia doesn’t get you elected.

Surprise, Surprise: NCGOP leaders are beginning to speak out against some of Patrick McHenry’s Republican-branded Xenophobia, many calling his crude attack methods against Democrats (many of which have caused him some embarassing moments in the House), even so far to say what has to be the greatest quote of this election season:

“McHenry and a lot of other Republicans in Washington need to get a clue,” - Lee Teague, the GOP chairman in Mecklenburg County

McHenry’s patent brand of Xenophobia was first seen in 2004, when McHenry used it to attack his Democratic challenger for his seat. McHenry became somewhat famous in the 10th District for blaming “Liberals” for many of Congress’ woes- generally speaking at GOP meetings about how Nancy Pelosi was “after him”.

The truth is, McHenry’s Liberal-bashing agenda has not only soured Democratic tastes, but also many Republicans, as the party struggles to reach across the aisle in a Democrat-controlled Congress. Ever since Democrats took control of Congress in 2006, Republicans have been working very hard to push Conservative legislation in Congress, which naturally requires the support of Democrats- but McHenry’s comments, including claiming Democrats were going overboard with earmarks, has done nothing but harm negotiations.

One perfect example of this was McHenry’s own major earmark, the “Home of the Perfect Christmas Tree”, which totaled up to $129,000- out of taxpayer funds. McHenry began in 2007 with a vicious campiagn attacking both Liberals and Conservatives for “pork barrel projects”, claiming massive waste of funds in Congress. Rather than attempting to work with many Democrats, he attacked voraciously, embarassing fellow Republicans with his childish speech. McHenry, naturally, never mentioned his own $129,000 pork barrel project- making sure to never mention it, despite vicious attacks he made on Congress at the same time.

The result? Congress decided to strip one pork barrel project: McHenry’s. 100 Republicans and 149 Democrats voted to strip one single line item out of a bill: McHenry’s “Perfect Christmas Tree” pork barrel project.

Washington – For the first time, one of Representative Jeff Flake’s (R-AZ) amendments to eliminate wasteful pork projects passed. Late last night, 100 Republicans and 149 Democrats voted to strip the Financial Services Appropriations Bill (HR 2829) of a $129,000 pork project offered by fellow Republican Patrick McHenry (R-NC) for the “Perfect Christmas Tree” project—a venture to subsidize North Carolina artists who make holiday decorations.

You read it correctly: 249 members of Congress were so angry with McHenry’s attacks that they decided to punish Avery County because their Congressman so hypocritically bashed pork barrel spending when he was participating in it himself. One would find it hilarious if it was not for the fact that now Avery County can forget about future money, thanks to a hard-headed Congressman and his attempts to scuplt Michelangelo’s David with a chainsaw for his own ego.

Of course, more recently, Patrick McHenry has been attacking challenger Daniel Johnson (a Democrat, naturally), with his same brand of Xenophobia as before. Not one month ago, McHenry claimed that Johnson was “Nancy Pelosi’s chosen recruit” with “pockets stuffed with cash from Washington liberals,”- despite having no proof. Embarassing the Republican party of his entire district, McHenry continues to throw out foolishly childish attacks against the Liberals, without any kind of substantive reason to attack. This is only months before McHenry called his Republican primary challenger “Lying Lance”- while not proving why he called him a liar (McHenry’s office loves to point out that it was his press spokesman who called him “Lying Lance”, trying to distance him from the embarassing comment).

The best thing is? McHenry’s tried to hide it. The NC Democratic Party jumped on the attack on Johnson quickly, obviously angry (as they usually get)- McHenry then removed the text. You can see the original version of the text on this blog (Warning: Not Safe for Conservatives), and his “new” version on his website, with the lines edited out. Obviously, McHenry knew this wasn’t working well.

This is certainly not to say that Republicans are supposed to not point out Democratic hypocracy: but when your attacks are full of doublespeak and without substantive reason, they do nothing but embarass your party. Trust us, there are many things to call out the Democrats on: name-calling is not one of them.

McHenry parties with known Lesbian Activists

Patrick McHenry loves to talk about how pro-sanctity of marriage he is- claiming he is for marriage as one man and one woman. However, his actions speak a different story- a story of McHenry being involved as much in the homosexual scene as the liberals themselves.

Mike Rogers, famous Liberal blogger (known best as the guy who “outed” people like Sen. Larry Craig, Rep. David Dreier, and Rep Ed Schrock), in 2008 made public two photos of Patrick McHenry partying with Jackie Sullens. Photos below:

Patrick McHenry parties with lesbian activists.

Patrick McHenry grasping a lesbian\'s breasts

The best part about these photos (other than the fact that McHenry is grabbing Sullens’ breasts in the second photo) is that Jackie Sullens is a open Lesbian. Not only does Sullens work for the GOP as the Gaston County Republican Women’s newsletter lady, but she openly lives with another woman, whom she is a lesbian relationship with.

Of course, the McHenry camp has never made a retort to these photos, and in fact many of the supporters claim these photos do not exist. However, you see them, I see them, and they are indeed real- and, lesbians or not, it is incredibly innapropriate for Patrick McHenry to be photoed in such a innapropriate light. Be honest: if this man was a Democrat, we would be appalled, and likewise, we should be now.

Patrick McHenry takes money for his attention

Patrick McHenry loves money- so much that he’s willing to sell his time, attention, and Congressional votes for it. Here are some examples of how he’s been doing that in the latest election season.

The McHenry “Victory Circle”- Buy a Congressman

Patrick McHenry, in what could be considered the most offensive attempt to gain campaign funds seen in any campaign, has recently taken to demanding money to meet with him- up to the tune of $9,200.

Patrick McHenry in the 2008 election cycle has taken to handing out cards entitled the “McHenry Victory Circle”, where Patrick McHenry has a list of “benefits” associated with the level of donation he recieves. For example, to gain access to a “Campaign Event” (such as a rally or dinner), a voter must pay $1,000- when a large percentage Americans make less than $40,000 a year. In McHenry’s economically depressed voting district, many voters live on minimum wages ($6.15/hr)- which often means less than $15,000 a year, depending on work schedule. You can see a scan of part of that brochure on the left (click to enlarge).

Of course, for those who are really fortunate and can afford the full $9,200 USD (which is accounted for a couple donation, in one election cycle the max per person is $4,600 USD), McHenry offers a “private Washington DC retreat” with him. In fact, unless you pay over $2,300 USD, you cannot obtain tickets to McHenry’s “McHenry Christmas Party” held in the district.

The numbers speak ill for McHenry. According to a 2000 Census, the median income for an individual in Catawba County (the most prominent county in the 10th District) was approximately $30,000 for Males, and $23,000 for Females. This essentially means that, to meet with Patrick McHenry, a working class individual would have to forefeit over 1/25th of their wages just to meet with their Congressman- and much more than that if they wanted to actually do anything other than recieve tickets to a “Campaign Event”.

In fact, according to reports made at the time this information came out, the brochure is even bold enough to say:

“Your support helps me continue rising in leadership and increasing my effectiveness.”

Who knew a Congressman’s effectiveness was tied to money?

Patrick McHenry protects Countrywide for big bucks, many lose their homes

Countrywide Financial, known best for being one of the major players in the mortgage crisis, now faces a FBI probe in a securities fraud case, after Countrwide allegedly misrepresented the soundness of it’s loans in filings, which it may have done to hide bad subprime loans. Countrywide’s actions may have led to thousands of Americans losing their homes: while CEO Angelo Mozilo made big bucks on the transactions.

It comes as no surprise that Congress had a hearing to discuss these CEO payments, espeically given the situation where many CEOs were making millions as their companies sank faster than the Titanic. Specifically, Mozilo’s payment was $120m USD, in a period where thousands of Countrywide employees have been laid off, the stock price has plummeted, and American families have lost their homes. On that committe? Patrick McHenry.

Strangely enough, Patrick McHenry was kind to the Countrywide CEO, to the point of not even asking any true questions- and essentially giving up his turn. Why? Because in 2005 and 2007 McHenry accepted $5000 in campaign contributions from Countrywide Financial and over $160,000 from other Real Estate PACs. In fact, McHenry’s top contributors are from the Real Estate Industry.

Did McHenry do what many Congressmen do and step down from the committe? Absolutely not. In fact, McHenry only used his time to essentially defend the Countrywide CEO, while many in his district struggle to keep their homes.

McHenry involved in NRCC money theft

The story goes that former NRCC treasurer Christopher Ward had been producing false internal audits to the tune of $740,000- money that was funneled to personal bank accounts and business funds.

Interestingly enough, McHenry was directly tied with Ward, donating a large amount of money to the NRCC when Ward was treasurer- and also to a number of campaigns that Ward worked on. A large amount of money (at least $160,000 that McHenry donated to the NRCC from his campaign funds) crossed Ward’s hands- and a large amount of that may have disappeared. There has been a large amount of discussion that McHenry was closely tied with Ward, both working together with finances for a period of time- a period of time in which McHenry would have clearly known that the audits were being doctored.

Ironically enough, this has scared McHenry so badly that he is now hiring the extremely expensive Wiley Rein, LLC for $3,000 a month- a law firm that specializes in election law and campaign finance. At this moment, McHenry has spent almost $30,000 hiring a law firm to literally sit and protect him, waiting for charges.

Patrick McHenry belittles and endangers US Troops in Iraq

Patrick McHenry refers to a security guard as a \"two bit\".In 2008, Patrick McHenry, during a speech he presented at a Lincoln Day Dinner in Lincoln County, weaved a very methodical story about a recent trip to Iraq- one that would inevitably show his true demeanor regarding the troops in Iraq. In his speech, he explained how he was “safe” in the Green Zone in Baghdad, yet he “couldn’t sleep”- so he decided to go to the gym in the morning, “not that I makes this a great habit”.

And so, in the morning, I got up early - not that I make this a great habit, but I went to the gym- because I just couldn’t sleep and everything else- and sure enough, the guard wouldn’t let me in, said I didn’t have the correct credentials. It’s 5:00 in the morning and I didn’t have sleep- I wasn’t too happy with this two bit security guard. And so, I said I wanted to see your supervisor. 30 minutes later, after the supervisor wasn’t happy with me, the escort me back to my room. It happens.

McHenry later went on to explain how this “two bit security guard” actually saved his life- as he claimed that during this rocket attack, the very gym he was claiming to get into was hit by insurgent fire. Of course, McHenry never made any thanks toward this officer- in fact, his speech did nothing but berate this brave guard who inevitably protected his life on that no doubt strange Easter morning.

Naturally, some of the Republicans during this speech were outraged at the flippant way in which McHenry weaved this story, and the way in which he obviously discredited a guard who saved his life- many in the room were veterans of past wars. Television stations like WLOS interviewed disgusted voters- many of which questioned McHenry’s reason for going to Iraq in the first place. Of course, the Democrats, especially on MSNBC, loving every minute of McHenry’s stupid comments, lashed out at Patrick McHenry, openly insulting Republicans, using his statement as an example of “what they really think about the troops”.

McHenry’s response was twofold- first, he openly denied the guard was an American soldier, claiming it was a “foreign contractor”- and essentially claimed that the guard’s nationality made it OK for him to belittle him. Secondly, he came forward with what is now known as his “Green Zone Video” (which we cannot post online due to Pentagon demands), which made any “two bit” comments look small in comparison.

Screenshot of the McHenry Green Zone video, now restricted by the Pentagon.The McHenry Green Zone Video is a video shot in the Green Zone only moments after the insurgents attacked, recorded from a video camera somewhat hidden shooting upward (at a height approximately 3″ off the ground, as evidenced by McHenry’s proportions), as if shot by holding it between the legs, where McHenry gives explicit detail of the attacks that just occured, essentially a “damage report”, including specific locations, pointing to a destroyed building in the background. McHenry, of course, also made sure to note about being restricted from entering the Gym, though not making any note of a foreign security guard.

The problem? McHenry had been clearly told by soldiers in the Green Zone to NOT record any video or give any specific damage reports, an offense which would be court-martiable if McHenry was in the military. Such information is regularly given to any visitors, as it constitutes Operational Security, or OPSEC. The video (which we cannot place online due to the Pentagon’s wishes, see below) gave explicit detail of the accuracy of attacks, which clearly endangered American lives. Brandon Friedman, a military veteran and vice chairman of VoteVets.org, made it clear:

“The bottom line is that whoever launched that strike could take the information McHenry provided and use it to kill Americans in the Green Zone, [...] This is why professionals operating in a combat zone are trained not to reveal any battle damage after an attack.”

In fact, the video was so offensive that the Pentagon demanded that McHenry remove the video. Did McHenry remove the video? Absolutely not. According to reports done by news organizations before his 2008 challenger made a press conference, McHenry’s video was still hosted on Congressional servers for up to a week after the Pentagon demanded the video to be removed. The URL (which is now dead) was easily retrievable from a variety of political blogs, aiding the enemy even further.

McHenry may have been responsible for the deaths of two US troops for posting this video, which led his primary challenger in 2008, Republican and ex-Air Force Judge Lance Sigmon to demand a congressional investigation into McHenry’s actions after reports came out that only days after these attacks occured, two soldiers (one a full Colonel) were killed in the same locations McHenry detailed in the video.

McHenry’s response to this was to claim that Sigmon, his opponent at the time, was utilizing the video as a “political gimmick”, insinuating that the potential deaths that came as a result of this video were unimportant. McHenry never apologized or claimed personal fault, and in fact never came forward with any statement about the video, only removing the video and accusing his challenger of being “absurd”- and refusing to answer questions at all future 10th District Republican events from then on, only using a press contact for all future comments.

One can only imagine how the families of those two soldiers feel- they may never know if a foolhardy Congressman may have cost the life of their loved one.

Patrick McHenry lives with student, encourages underage drinking, funds Voter Fraud

Aaron Lay smilingIn 2004, when Patrick McHenry ran against other Republicans in the Congressional Primary, he was well known for using College Republicans to assist his campaign work- being the youngest man on the ballot, this was no surprise to no-one. However, as history would show, Patrick McHenry would make some of the dumbest moves of his life in this election.

In this 2004 election, it was revealed that Patrick McHenry was living with a campaign staffer, Michael Aaron Lay. Lay, who served as a former campaign aide, stayed at McHenry’s house well into the 2004 election, and evidence of a traffic ticket reveals that Lay stayed at McHenry’s house well into 2005, past the election cycle. While Lay technically stayed a resident of Tennessee, he nonetheless lived with McHenry most of the week, where he listed himself as a resident.

During this time, McHenry was charged with getting many of these underage College Republicans drunk and partying with them. According to Affidavidts with the North Carolina Alcohol Law Enforcement agency, McHenry was closely involved (or potentially hosted) a party with underage students after a 2004 Catawba County Lincoln Day dinner, in which beer and wine liberally flowed, and McHenry was photoed holding a lollypop with drunk students clearly holding cans of alcohol (right). According to statements by the Alcohol Law Enforcement agency, the students asserted that the alcohol was provided by the McHenry camp, though this is questionable. Despite the source of the alcohol, it was clear through reports that McHenry was fully aware of both the alcohol consumption and the age of many of the staffers.

The living situation became worse as Lay was found to have voted illegally twice in McHenry’s election- by using McHenry’s Cherryville home as a “residence” and voting for McHenry. Michael Aaron Lay was not a permanent resident of North Carolina, and under NC law, it is illegal to register in a district when you have no intentions of permanently living in that district. In this primary race, McHenry won by only 86 votes- so naturally, voters were a little disturbed by the way in which McHenry’s staffer was voting.


Photo: Michael Aaron Lay (far right) in court

Naturally, Lay was charged with Voter Fraud in Gaston County- but here’s where it gets even dirtier. McHenry then quickly utilized his PAC, “More Conservatives“, which good Republicans donate to for Republicans to get into office, to fund Lay’s court case, despite the wishes of those donating to the PAC. According to Roll Call, Patrick McHenry gave Lay two payments of $5,000 for “Legal Expense Donation[s]“-

Thanks, Boss. Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) recently gave Michael Aaron Lay $10,000 to beat back voter fraud charges brought while the former campaign aide worked for the now-Member.

According to recent Federal Election Commission filings, McHenry gave Lay $5,000 out of his political action committee, More Conservatives PAC, in two payments during February and March.

The contributions were labeled “legal expense donation[s].” McHenry had given Lay another $10,000 in July 2007.

Actually, Roll Call was behind the scenes- according to government watchdog OpenSecrets.org, More Conservatives PAC gave Michael Aaron Lay a total of $20,000- more money than the PAC gave to any individual except for a political advertising group. Michael Aaron Lay was given more money by More Conservatives PAC than any campaign in the history of the PAC.

Of course,when McHenry was confronted about this in the 2008 primary battle, his spokesman, Wes Climer, had this to say:

Climer emphasized the “More Conservatives” PAC is used broadly and isn’t specifically for campaign funds.
“The charges were dismissed, and the congressman is glad Aaron can move on with his life,” Climer said.

Actually, this is a lie. Michael Aaron Lay took what is called a “deferred prosecution deal” and did not contest the charges- and he must complete 100 hours of community service and pay $240.50 in court fees and $250.00 in community service fees to have the charges dismissed. By utilizing this deal, Lay was able to not only avoid admitting guilt, but avoid any further investigation into the McHenry camp’s dealings- which may explain the money that flowed toward Lay during this time.

Of course, More Conservatives PAC has given donors no information about the use of their money. Despite records proving that such money was indeed given, the website still claims the funds are used in “electing More Conservatives to Congress“- with no mention of “broad use” of donated funds. As mentioned above, more money has gone to paying for Michael Aaron Lay’s defense than towards ANY campaign recipient- and that’s saying something.

Of course, during this time, Patrick McHenry made himself a national laughingstock as he accused District Attorney Locke Bell of persecuting Lay and his own campaign:

“This is the culmination of a three-year smear campaign against Congressman McHenry, his campaign workers and supporters,” Deans’ statement read. “This case is much like the Duke lacrosse case in that a politically-motivated district attorney sought an indictment against a young man without even granting him an interview.”

The joke?

Locke Bell, a strong Republican, supported McHenry- in fact, so much, that he held a fundraiser for him, and openly admitted to doing so in the Charlotte Observer. In fact, it was impossible for Bell to hold a “three year smear campaign” when Bell had only been a District Attorney for a few months, and “inhereted” the case from his predecessor. Meaning? Not only had Bell not had the time to even consider McHenry until a few months before this all came out, Bell was supporting McHenry! Of course, leave it up to the Democrats to find this out and make all Republicans look incredibly stupid.

It’s a sad day when a Republican Congressman makes us all look stupid and even the Democrats get to laugh.

« Previous Page